Member's Login

              Why Join Us?

Forum 2009

Supply Chain Asia Forum 2009 will be held in Singapore from 7-9 July 2009 at Sheraton Towers Hotel. Forum brochure is now available for download. If you keen to participate as a sponsor, you can download the Marketing Kit by clicking here.

eNewsletter

Name:
Email:


Latest Events

Executive Diploma in Supply Chain Management (Asia) - 1st Intake
Jan 5th - Jan 9th
8:00am - 5:00pm
Supply Chain Careers 2009
Mar 28th - Mar 28th
9:00am - 4:00pm
Supply Chain Asia Forum 2009
Jul 7th - Jul 9th
8:00am - 5:00pm

Corporate Endorsers

AEB

GATI

Intermec

Logistics Bureau Asia



Oracle

YCH Group

Corporate Endoser Marketing Kit

Executive Diploma

Executive Diploma in Supply Chain Management (Asia) is a joint project between Rasmussen & Simonsen International (RSI) and Supply Chain Asia Academy. An industry-focused program and train entirely by practitioners of the profession, the first intake is from 5-9 Januaryt 2009 and will be held in Singapore. Click here for more information.

Tell A Friend

Help us to reach out to the community.You can help share this site with your friend by CLICKING HERE

Who's Online

We have 1 guest online

Financial Assistance

Want to participate in our events but can't afford due to budget constraints or financial restrictions? We want to do all we can to support your growth. Kindly email us at assist@supplychainasia.com and we will find ways whereby we can support you.
Advertisement
Editorial Commentary
Editorial Commentary – Building Entrepreneurial Bridges between China, Asia & USA Print E-mail

We live in exciting times. Change is indeed pervasive, rapid and unrelenting. The pace and complexity might be a nightmare for some but a fertile ground for new opportunities and value creation.

USA’s recovery requires a great change in direction of capital flows. America has borrowed nearly $1 trillion a year, mostly from the developing world, and used these funds to import consumer goods and buy homes at low interest rates. The result is a solvency crisis of the American household, which shows up as a solvency crisis for financial institutions. If we reckon the retirement needs of households as a liability, the household sector is as good as bankrupt.


No recovery is possible unless American households can save, and they cannot save in an economic contraction when incomes spiral downwards. To save, Americans must sell goods and services to someone else, and a glance at the globe makes clear who that must be: nearly half the world's population, and most of the world's capacity for economic growth, is concentrated in China and the Pacific Littoral.


China's economic problem is the inverse of America's: China has achieved fast rates of growth at the expense of huge disparities between the prosperous coast and the backward interior, as well as excessive dependence on foreign markets. China's policy response to the economic crisis is far more radical than Washington's. Rather than attempting to patch up the situation and restore the status quo ante, China plans to spend nearly a fifth of its gross domestic product on an internal stimulus focused on infrastructure in its interior. Severe execution risk attends the Chinese proposal, and markets remain to be convinced.


China can reduce the execution risk of its great economic shift towards home consumption, and America can solve its savings problem, through a grand partnership. This partnership need not be exclusive to America and China, but it must be founded on America and China, two of the world's largest economies. India and the other Asian economies should be encouraged to join this partnership. A great deal has been written about prospective conflict between China and the United States, but very little explanation is offered as to what issues might arise between China and the United States. China and America have far more to gain from cooperation than from conflict.


Is it conceivable that the United States could offer China a general reduction in restrictions on imports of American technology and acquisition of American companies, in return for a treaty linking Chinese and American security interests?

There are close to 2 billion people in China and the countries in its immediate periphery, and a further 1.1 billion people in India. Half the world's population lives in emerging Asia, and its productivity could triple in a generation. Out of the present crisis, the world might enjoy one of the longest and fastest economic booms in history - or it might remain in economic mire for a decade. The incoming American administration might be remembered as one of the worst, or one of the best, in American history.

If this is the likely scenario that is going to take place, perhaps, there must be a great need for “entrepreneurial bridges” between the U.S. and China.

Contributed by a Supply Chain Asia reader

 
Editorial Commentary – Why Invest in People in Lean Times Print E-mail

Many organizations view learning and development as overhead, or a luxury, leading to it being one of the first things to go when companies look to cut costs. Corporate spending on learning and development, like anything, is an investment. During times of uncertainty and budget cuts, the question is inevitably raised as to whether spending on people development makes sense.

In good times and bad, the global shipping and transportation industry faces common challenges relating to people development. What are these challenges? Although there are many perspectives available, three common themes typically exist among leading players in this space - Talent Retention, Skill shortage and Knowledge shortage.

Do these challenges go away in an economic downturn? Likely not. One could argue that addressing these challenges becomes significantly more important and remain a critical area for investment for serious industry contenders. Why? The following are achievable benefits from investing in learning and development:

Increased employee job satisfaction, morale, motivation and productivity

Increased ability to adapt to change

Increased innovation among individuals

Increased image and goodwill of the company

The alignment of learning and development with business strategies can help companies improve business results. Investing in the right people development is proven to increase productivity, improve employee retention, improve job satisfaction, improve sale performance and customer service.

If learning and development is so beneficial, why is it seen as a luxury or as overhead? Often the case exists where previous experiences or investments made have not achieved any real value. How can companies overcome this?

The key is to ensure that learning and development initiatives are specifically tied to business strategy and results while at the same time are measurable.

Whether working internally or hiring externally, evaluate all your options and get creative. A good provider should be flexible and respond to your needs as well as provide alternative solutions that meet both learning and budget requirements.

In short, the investment in learning and development is critical even in lean times, but making sure you are able to get the maximum benefits and impact from the investment is more important than ever. In challenging markets, we need to do more, with less - learning and development is an important of achieving this objective.

Amanda Rasmussen

CEO, Rasmussen & Simonsen International

EXCO Member, Supply Chain Asia

arasmussen@r-instl.com
 
Editorial Commentary – What is asset to one may be a liability to another Print E-mail

As the financial crisis continues to dominate the news and the fear of recession looms, many companies are pondering before they enter into a phase of cash flow crunch, whether they should consider finding a buyer. An incident of a retail company decided to take the plunge and was surprised to find several potential suitors. However, that’s where the good news ended.


One potential buyer sent in a consulting firm to perform due diligence; looking at their financials, facilities, manufacturing, employee benefits, labor issues and lastly their inventory.


This retail company had a huge inventory which was naturally listed as assets. However, the due diligence soon found that the inventory was several years old; much of it had been superceded and basically unsaleable. Subsequently the retail company has to decide whether to accept a substantially lower offer for their company or try to ride out the financial storm.

The financial crisis will have extensive repercussions to assets-heavy companies today. Those who owned heavily financed infrastructure may find their path ahead strewn with potential financial land-mines. The supply chain industry would be in for another round of consolidation should there be a heavy sell-off of these infrastructural assets.

Paul Lim

Founder/President

 
Supply Chain Commentary – Are there holes in your fence? Print E-mail